Prepaid cell
phones can be very useful for certain markets. Certain people who do not use
cell phones often can find these devices very useful. If one does not text
message, use a large amount of data, or even make frequent phone calls, then
prepaid phone are very practical. It would be senseless for a person to pay a
large contract fee if he or she does not use the phone frequently. Prepaid
phones are also very useful for people who struggle financially or have bad
credit. The idea of prepaid phones being paid in cash is useful for this market
because they can set an exact affordable amount and do not have to worry about
any chance of a high monthly bill. One way prepaid phones can be managed by the
government is to attach a name to the phone number when the phone is
registered. Doing away with prepaid phones will not stop the communication of criminals;
it will simply just force them to find new ways of unidentified communication. Prepaid
phones should be permitted by the government because it is unfair for phone
companies and people who use them for legitimate reasons.
The Good, the Bad, the Ugly
Wednesday, September 26, 2012
Location Tracking Assignment Four
The proposal to implant computer tracking chips into young
children proposes various possible privacy issues. If a child where to be
planted with a tracking chip, their location and information could potentially
be accessed by predators and kidnappers, increasing their safety risk immensely.
Hacking is a growing privacy issue in today’s technology, so the potential risk of a
predator hacking the chip information could be very probable. The chip also
imposes the question of, does this cause infringement on a child’s personal
privacy rights? Although this may not directly apply to young children under
the age of five, teenagers may feel a sense of violation from their parents or
guardians. This proposes the question of, what age is appropriate to deactivate
the tracking device and who legislates this? Such questions, risks, and privacy
rights cause a great deal of conflict and disagreement among people and their
children, so I feel the risks and conflict outweigh the benefits by a long shot.
If
Congress were to require ID chips in young children, I would not support it. I
feel such chips will eventually cause more harm than good, giving child
predators and kidnappers a new way to harm and access young children. However I
do support this concept with elderly people who suffer from a medical
condition, such as Alzheimer’s. Such a chip could help and assist people in the
medical field and their patients.
Tuesday, September 18, 2012
Welcome to The Good, The Bad, and The Ugly
Hello my name is Adriana Destefanis and I am a sophomore at the University of New Hampshire. I am taking the course, CS 408, that explores the internet and the implications it has on our society. This class helps analyze the consequences of certain technologies, along with their benefits. Stay tuned for future blog discussions and debates involving certain technologies in our society.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)